Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS BARTLETT MED CTR 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS BARTLETT MED CTR
CCN 440228 | TN | 196 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$6.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$129.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$6.8M
Modeled Uplift
$4.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.5M (vs $6.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$83K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$71K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$397K$1.2M$1.6M$5.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$83K$83K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$646K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$640K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$524K$1.0M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$41K$83K$83K$83K$83K$83K$83K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.3x102% / 34.0x107% / 37.7x109% / 39.6x111% / 41.4x
9.0x93% / 26.5x97% / 29.8x101% / 33.1x103% / 34.8x105% / 36.5x
10.0x88% / 23.6x93% / 26.5x97% / 29.5x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.5x
11.0x84% / 21.1x89% / 23.8x93% / 26.5x95% / 27.9x96% / 29.2x
12.0x80% / 19.1x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
71%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 71% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M1.5%
Year 1$2.0M+$4.5M$6.6M5.1%
Year 2$2.1M+$6.8M$8.9M6.9%
Year 3$2.2M+$6.8M$9.0M6.9%
Year 4$2.2M+$6.8M$9.0M7.0%
Year 5$2.3M+$6.8M$9.1M7.0%
$19.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$100.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$80.3M
Value Created
$9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.2M
Organic Growth
$68.0M
RCM Value Creation
$9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$786K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$41K$62K$83K$99K
Total$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-7.4%1.5%11.9%
P48
Net-to-Gross9.8%13.6%18.4%27.5%
P3
Occupancy49.9%51.2%68.6%76.9%
P17
Rev/Bed$659K$700K$1.2M$1.4M
P21
Exp/Bed$649K$629K$973K$1.3M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML