Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR STONECREST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR STONECREST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440227 | TN | 115 beds | Current EBITDA $75.1M → Pro Forma $85.1M (+$10.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$190.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$75.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$85.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$10.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $10.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$122K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$104K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$583K$1.7M$2.3M$7.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$122K$122K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$950K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$941K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$771K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$61K$122K$122K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$75.1M$75.1M39.5%
Year 1$77.4M+$6.7M$84.0M44.2%
Year 2$79.7M+$10.0M$89.7M47.2%
Year 3$82.1M+$10.0M$92.1M48.5%
Year 4$84.5M+$10.0M$94.5M49.7%
Year 5$87.1M+$10.0M$97.1M51.1%
$751.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.07B
Exit EV (11x)
$316.6M
Value Created
$97.1M
Exit EBITDA
$119.6M
Organic Growth
$100.0M
RCM Value Creation
$97.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$61K$91K$122K$146K
Total$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin39.5%-7.3%1.8%14.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross16.6%14.5%18.4%29.5%
P33
Occupancy64.9%42.1%66.6%80.7%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.7M$476K$920K$1.4M
P88
Exp/Bed$999K$473K$718K$1.2M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML