Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE CENTER FOR SPINAL SURGERY 2026-04-26 03:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE CENTER FOR SPINAL SURGERY
CCN 440218 | TN | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $31.0M → Pro Forma $35.1M (+$4.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$78.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$31.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$35.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$958K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$50K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$43K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$241K$716K$958K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$50K$50K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$394K$787K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$390K$779K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$319K$638K$958K$958K$958K$958K$958K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.1x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$31.0M$31.0M39.3%
Year 1$31.9M+$2.8M$34.6M44.0%
Year 2$32.8M+$4.1M$37.0M47.0%
Year 3$33.8M+$4.1M$38.0M48.2%
Year 4$34.8M+$4.1M$39.0M49.5%
Year 5$35.9M+$4.1M$40.0M50.9%
$309.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$440.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$130.7M
Value Created
$40.0M
Exit EBITDA
$49.3M
Organic Growth
$41.4M
RCM Value Creation
$40.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$787K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$779K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$479K$718K$958K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$38K$50K$60K
Total$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin39.3%-16.7%-0.9%8.8%
P98
Net-to-Gross30.2%19.8%29.1%41.7%
P53
Occupancy29.7%23.9%34.7%64.8%
P37
Rev/Bed$3.4M$401K$537K$1.1M
P96
Exp/Bed$2.1M$376K$593K$1.1M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML