Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SKYRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SKYRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440185 | TN | 176 beds | Current EBITDA $28.2M → Pro Forma $36.8M (+$8.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$163.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$8.6M
Modeled Uplift
$6.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.0M (vs $8.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$105K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$90K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$502K$1.5M$2.0M$6.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$105K$105K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$817K$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$809K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$663K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$52K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.2M$28.2M17.3%
Year 1$29.1M+$5.7M$34.8M21.3%
Year 2$29.9M+$8.6M$38.5M23.6%
Year 3$30.8M+$8.6M$39.4M24.1%
Year 4$31.8M+$8.6M$40.3M24.7%
Year 5$32.7M+$8.6M$41.3M25.3%
$282.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$454.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$172.2M
Value Created
$41.3M
Exit EBITDA
$44.9M
Organic Growth
$86.0M
RCM Value Creation
$41.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$995K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$52K$78K$105K$126K
Total$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$10.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.3%-7.4%1.5%12.2%
P86
Net-to-Gross9.7%13.6%18.0%28.2%
P0
Occupancy68.4%50.3%67.7%76.9%
P50
Rev/Bed$929K$542K$1.0M$1.4M
P43
Exp/Bed$768K$540K$864K$1.2M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML