Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INDIAN PATH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INDIAN PATH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 440176 | TN | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $17.1M → Pro Forma $24.7M (+$7.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$142.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$7.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $7.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$91K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$79K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$438K$1.3M$1.7M$5.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$91K$91K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$714K$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$707K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$579K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$46K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.1M$17.1M12.0%
Year 1$17.7M+$5.0M$22.7M15.9%
Year 2$18.2M+$7.5M$25.7M18.0%
Year 3$18.7M+$7.5M$26.2M18.4%
Year 4$19.3M+$7.5M$26.8M18.8%
Year 5$19.9M+$7.5M$27.4M19.2%
$171.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$301.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$129.8M
Value Created
$27.4M
Exit EBITDA
$27.3M
Organic Growth
$75.1M
RCM Value Creation
$27.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$869K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$46K$69K$91K$110K
Total$3.8M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.0%-14.4%-0.6%8.7%
P84
Net-to-Gross16.4%19.8%27.9%40.6%
P13
Occupancy72.3%22.6%37.1%66.2%
P79
Rev/Bed$4.1M$405K$549K$986K
P98
Exp/Bed$3.6M$368K$573K$1.0M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML