Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PARKWEST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 11:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PARKWEST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440173 | TN | 361 beds | Current EBITDA $-21.9M → Pro Forma $-1.1M (+$20.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$396.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-21.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$20.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.4M (vs $20.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$254K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$218K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$254K$254K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$16.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-21.9M$-21.9M-5.5%
Year 1$-22.6M+$13.9M$-8.7M-2.2%
Year 2$-23.2M+$20.9M$-2.4M-0.6%
Year 3$-23.9M+$20.9M$-3.1M-0.8%
Year 4$-24.7M+$20.9M$-3.8M-1.0%
Year 5$-25.4M+$20.9M$-4.5M-1.1%
$-219.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-49.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$169.1M
Value Created
$-4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-34.9M
Organic Growth
$208.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$190K$254K$304K
Total$10.4M$15.6M$20.9M$25.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.5%-8.8%1.3%7.7%
P35
Net-to-Gross29.7%14.0%20.1%27.6%
P87
Occupancy73.0%67.2%74.2%80.7%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.3M$1.4M
P30
Exp/Bed$1.2M$908K$1.2M$1.4M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML