Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEM HOSPITAL UNION CITY 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEM HOSPITAL UNION CITY
CCN 440130 | TN | 43 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $5.2M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$865K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$999K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$614K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$971K$28K$999K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$155K$459K$614K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$252K$505K$757K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$250K$499K$749K$999K$999K$999K$999K
A/R Days Reduction$0$205K$409K$614K$614K$614K$614K$614K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$723K$1.4M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.2x77% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x
9.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
10.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
11.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
12.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M5.1%
Year 1$2.7M+$1.8M$4.4M8.8%
Year 2$2.8M+$2.7M$5.4M10.7%
Year 3$2.8M+$2.7M$5.5M10.9%
Year 4$2.9M+$2.7M$5.6M11.1%
Year 5$3.0M+$2.7M$5.7M11.2%
$26.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$62.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.3M
Value Created
$5.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$26.5M
RCM Value Creation
$5.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$505K$757K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$499K$749K$999K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$307K$460K$614K$737K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.1%-12.1%0.6%9.3%
P61
Net-to-Gross18.7%19.7%27.8%40.9%
P22
Occupancy47.2%24.6%54.0%71.0%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.2M$395K$549K$1.0M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.1M$351K$525K$1.1M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML