Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT THOMAS WEST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT THOMAS WEST HOSPITAL
CCN 440082 | TN | 643 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $58.0M (+$55.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.06B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$55.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$58.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$40.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$55.5M
Modeled Uplift
$39.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $39.3M (vs $55.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$676K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$55.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.1M$21.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.3M$581K$20.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.2M$9.6M$12.8M$40.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$676K$676K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.8M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.2M$10.5M$15.7M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$338K$676K$676K$676K$676K$676K$676K
Cumulative$0$15.1M$30.2M$45.0M$55.5M$55.5M$55.5M$55.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $55.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x180% / 173.3x186% / 192.9x192% / 212.6x195% / 222.4x197% / 232.2x
9.0x174% / 153.7x180% / 171.1x185% / 188.6x188% / 197.3x190% / 206.0x
10.0x168% / 138.0x174% / 153.7x179% / 169.4x182% / 177.2x184% / 185.1x
11.0x163% / 125.2x168% / 139.4x174% / 153.7x176% / 160.8x179% / 168.0x
12.0x158% / 114.5x164% / 127.5x169% / 140.6x171% / 147.2x174% / 153.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.1x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.4x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M0.2%
Year 1$2.5M+$37.0M$39.5M3.7%
Year 2$2.6M+$55.5M$58.1M5.5%
Year 3$2.6M+$55.5M$58.2M5.5%
Year 4$2.7M+$55.5M$58.3M5.5%
Year 5$2.8M+$55.5M$58.3M5.5%
$24.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$641.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$617.5M
Value Created
$58.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.8M
Organic Growth
$555.4M
RCM Value Creation
$58.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.6M$15.8M$21.1M$25.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.5M$15.7M$20.9M$25.1M
A/R Days Reduction$6.4M$9.6M$12.8M$15.4M
Clean Claim Rate$338K$507K$676K$811K
Total$27.8M$41.7M$55.5M$66.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-11.8%-6.0%1.4%
P57
Net-to-Gross20.1%16.0%20.6%27.1%
P43
Occupancy88.0%71.2%73.8%79.3%
P86
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.3M$1.5M
P79
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.3M$1.5M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML