Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LECONTE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LECONTE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440081 | TN | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $8.0M → Pro Forma $14.7M (+$6.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$126.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$6.6M
Modeled Uplift
$5.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.0M (vs $6.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$81K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$69K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$387K$1.1M$1.5M$4.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$81K$81K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$631K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$625K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$512K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$81K$81K$81K$81K$81K$81K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
9.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x
10.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
11.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
12.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.0M$8.0M6.4%
Year 1$8.3M+$4.4M$12.7M10.1%
Year 2$8.5M+$6.6M$15.2M12.0%
Year 3$8.8M+$6.6M$15.4M12.2%
Year 4$9.0M+$6.6M$15.7M12.4%
Year 5$9.3M+$6.6M$16.0M12.6%
$80.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$175.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$95.2M
Value Created
$16.0M
Exit EBITDA
$12.8M
Organic Growth
$66.4M
RCM Value Creation
$16.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$768K$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$61K$81K$97K
Total$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.4%-11.3%0.6%12.0%
P57
Net-to-Gross26.8%17.4%23.2%41.9%
P54
Occupancy83.3%31.4%64.1%80.7%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.1M$401K$550K$1.1M
P94
Exp/Bed$2.0M$357K$546K$1.1M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML