Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST TN HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEER HOSPITA 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST TN HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEER HOSPITA
CCN 440061 | TN | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $-3.9M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$907K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$752K
Risk-Adjusted
-$492K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$473K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$468K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$288K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$473K$473K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$455K$13K$468K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$215K$288K$907K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$118K$236K$355K$473K$473K$473K$473K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$117K$234K$351K$468K$468K$468K$468K
A/R Days Reduction$0$96K$192K$288K$288K$288K$288K$288K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$339K$677K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-21.6%
Year 1$-5.3M+$829K$-4.4M-18.7%
Year 2$-5.4M+$1.2M$-4.2M-17.6%
Year 3$-5.6M+$1.2M$-4.3M-18.3%
Year 4$-5.7M+$1.2M$-4.5M-19.0%
Year 5$-5.9M+$1.2M$-4.7M-19.8%
$-51.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-51.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-357K
Value Created
$-4.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$12.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$236K$355K$473K$567K
Denial Rate Reductio$234K$351K$468K$562K
A/R Days Reduction$144K$216K$288K$345K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$622K$933K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.6%-12.4%-0.5%8.7%
P16
Net-to-Gross25.8%19.8%27.8%38.7%
P41
Occupancy20.7%23.8%44.7%69.0%
P20
Rev/Bed$622K$405K$549K$1.0M
P57
Exp/Bed$756K$368K$573K$1.1M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML