Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440059 | TN | 212 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $27.4M (+$19.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$372.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$19.6M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $19.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$238K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$205K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$238K$238K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.7M$15.9M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x88% / 23.6x93% / 26.6x97% / 29.5x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.5x
9.0x83% / 20.6x88% / 23.2x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x95% / 28.5x
10.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x
11.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
12.0x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
63%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 63% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M2.1%
Year 1$8.0M+$13.1M$21.1M5.7%
Year 2$8.3M+$19.6M$27.9M7.5%
Year 3$8.5M+$19.6M$28.1M7.6%
Year 4$8.8M+$19.6M$28.4M7.6%
Year 5$9.1M+$19.6M$28.7M7.7%
$78.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$315.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$237.0M
Value Created
$28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$195.9M
RCM Value Creation
$28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$179K$238K$286K
Total$9.8M$14.7M$19.6M$23.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-8.0%1.5%12.0%
P52
Net-to-Gross32.8%14.5%18.4%25.8%
P87
Occupancy76.4%50.9%68.6%77.8%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.8M$777K$1.1M$1.4M
P90
Exp/Bed$1.7M$666K$944K$1.3M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML