Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 440056 | TN | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $11.0M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$747K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$188K$558K$747K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$307K$613K$920K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$304K$607K$911K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$249K$498K$747K$747K$747K$747K$747K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$879K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M12.7%
Year 1$8.0M+$2.2M$10.2M16.5%
Year 2$8.2M+$3.2M$11.5M18.7%
Year 3$8.5M+$3.2M$11.7M19.1%
Year 4$8.7M+$3.2M$12.0M19.5%
Year 5$9.0M+$3.2M$12.2M19.9%
$77.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$134.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$56.9M
Value Created
$12.2M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$32.3M
RCM Value Creation
$12.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$613K$920K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$607K$911K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$373K$560K$747K$896K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.7%-11.3%0.6%12.0%
P76
Net-to-Gross13.8%17.4%23.2%41.9%
P8
Occupancy42.1%31.4%64.1%80.7%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.1M$401K$550K$1.1M
P71
Exp/Bed$924K$357K$546K$1.1M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML