Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SYCAMORE SHOALS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SYCAMORE SHOALS HOSPITAL
CCN 440018 | TN | 109 beds | Current EBITDA $16K → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$52.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$643K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$162K$481K$643K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$264K$529K$793K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$262K$523K$785K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$214K$429K$643K$643K$643K$643K$643K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$758K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x319% / 1285.6x328% / 1428.8x336% / 1572.0x340% / 1643.6x343% / 1715.2x
9.0x309% / 1142.4x318% / 1269.7x326% / 1397.0x329% / 1460.7x333% / 1524.3x
10.0x300% / 1027.8x309% / 1142.4x317% / 1257.0x320% / 1314.3x324% / 1371.5x
11.0x293% / 934.1x301% / 1038.3x309% / 1142.4x313% / 1194.5x316% / 1246.6x
12.0x286% / 856.0x294% / 951.5x302% / 1046.9x305% / 1094.7x309% / 1142.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
99%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 99% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.0x, adding 8.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16K$16K0.0%
Year 1$16K+$1.9M$1.9M3.5%
Year 2$17K+$2.8M$2.8M5.3%
Year 3$17K+$2.8M$2.8M5.3%
Year 4$18K+$2.8M$2.8M5.3%
Year 5$18K+$2.8M$2.8M5.3%
$159K
Entry EV (10x)
$30.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.6M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$25K
Organic Growth
$27.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$529K$793K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$523K$785K$1.0M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$322K$483K$643K$772K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.0%-8.3%1.1%13.1%
P45
Net-to-Gross16.8%15.6%19.2%30.4%
P34
Occupancy31.5%41.1%66.2%76.9%
P19
Rev/Bed$485K$468K$920K$1.3M
P27
Exp/Bed$485K$384K$684K$1.2M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML