Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:12 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 440008 | TN | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$800K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$669K
Risk-Adjusted
-$428K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$417K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$413K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$254K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$417K$417K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$401K$11K$413K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$64K$190K$254K$800K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$104K$209K$313K$417K$417K$417K$417K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$103K$206K$310K$413K$413K$413K$413K
A/R Days Reduction$0$85K$169K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$299K$597K$890K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M9.3%
Year 1$2.0M+$731K$2.7M13.1%
Year 2$2.1M+$1.1M$3.2M15.1%
Year 3$2.1M+$1.1M$3.2M15.4%
Year 4$2.2M+$1.1M$3.3M15.7%
Year 5$2.2M+$1.1M$3.3M16.0%
$19.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$36.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.4M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.1M
Organic Growth
$11.0M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$209K$313K$417K$500K
Denial Rate Reductio$206K$310K$413K$495K
A/R Days Reduction$127K$190K$254K$304K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$549K$823K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-13.0%-0.8%7.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross20.3%19.7%27.8%39.5%
P29
Occupancy21.4%23.9%39.7%68.3%
P23
Rev/Bed$579K$403K$561K$1.0M
P53
Exp/Bed$525K$364K$593K$1.1M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML