Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SKYLINE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SKYLINE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440006 | TN | 350 beds | Current EBITDA $54.3M → Pro Forma $73.3M (+$19.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$360.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$54.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$73.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$19.0M
Modeled Uplift
$13.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.2M (vs $19.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$231K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.2M$7.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$198K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$231K$231K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$115K$231K$231K$231K$231K$231K$231K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.3M$15.4M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$54.3M$54.3M15.1%
Year 1$56.0M+$12.6M$68.6M19.0%
Year 2$57.6M+$19.0M$76.6M21.3%
Year 3$59.4M+$19.0M$78.3M21.7%
Year 4$61.2M+$19.0M$80.1M22.2%
Year 5$63.0M+$19.0M$82.0M22.7%
$543.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$901.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$358.1M
Value Created
$82.0M
Exit EBITDA
$86.5M
Organic Growth
$189.6M
RCM Value Creation
$82.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$115K$173K$231K$277K
Total$9.5M$14.2M$19.0M$22.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.1%-8.7%1.4%9.0%
P79
Net-to-Gross12.0%13.5%19.9%27.4%
P12
Occupancy73.4%67.3%73.8%80.2%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.0M$1.0M$1.2M$1.4M
P25
Exp/Bed$874K$854K$1.2M$1.4M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML