Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.5M (vs $41.9M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $15.9M | $15.9M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $15.3M | $438K | $15.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $2.4M | $7.3M | $9.7M | $30.6M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $510K | $510K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 28.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $4.0M | $8.0M | $12.0M | $15.9M | $15.9M | $15.9M | $15.9M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $3.9M | $7.9M | $11.8M | $15.8M | $15.8M | $15.8M | $15.8M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $3.2M | $6.5M | $9.7M | $9.7M | $9.7M | $9.7M | $9.7M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $255K | $510K | $510K | $510K | $510K | $510K | $510K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $11.4M | $22.8M | $34.0M | $41.9M | $41.9M | $41.9M | $41.9M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.9M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 101% / 33.1x | 106% / 37.2x | 110% / 41.2x | 112% / 43.2x | 114% / 45.2x |
| 9.0x | 96% / 29.1x | 101% / 32.7x | 105% / 36.3x | 107% / 38.1x | 109% / 39.9x |
| 10.0x | 92% / 25.9x | 96% / 29.1x | 100% / 32.3x | 102% / 33.9x | 104% / 35.5x |
| 11.0x | 88% / 23.2x | 92% / 26.1x | 96% / 29.1x | 98% / 30.6x | 100% / 32.0x |
| 12.0x | 84% / 21.0x | 88% / 23.7x | 92% / 26.4x | 94% / 27.7x | 96% / 29.1x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 73% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.8x, adding 6.7 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $11.0M | — | $11.0M | 1.4% |
| Year 1 | $11.3M | +$28.0M | $39.3M | 4.9% |
| Year 2 | $11.7M | +$41.9M | $53.6M | 6.7% |
| Year 3 | $12.0M | +$41.9M | $53.9M | 6.8% |
| Year 4 | $12.4M | +$41.9M | $54.3M | 6.8% |
| Year 5 | $12.7M | +$41.9M | $54.7M | 6.9% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $8.0M | $12.0M | $15.9M | $19.1M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $7.9M | $11.8M | $15.8M | $18.9M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $4.8M | $7.3M | $9.7M | $11.6M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $255K | $383K | $510K | $612K |
| Total | $21.0M | $31.5M | $41.9M | $50.3M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 1.4% | -12.7% | -6.4% | 1.4% | P71 |
| Net-to-Gross | 28.0% | 18.3% | 21.1% | 28.0% | P71 |
| Occupancy | 75.1% | 70.7% | 74.2% | 83.5% | P53 |
| Rev/Bed | $1.4M | $1.0M | $1.3M | $1.5M | P59 |
| Exp/Bed | $1.4M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.5M | P59 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.