Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH DAKOTA HUMAN SERVICES CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH DAKOTA HUMAN SERVICES CENTER
CCN 434003 | SD | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $418K → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$418K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$675K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$170K$505K$675K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$278K$555K$833K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$275K$550K$824K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$225K$450K$675K$675K$675K$675K$675K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$795K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x124% / 56.3x129% / 62.9x134% / 69.5x136% / 72.8x138% / 76.1x
9.0x118% / 49.7x123% / 55.5x128% / 61.4x130% / 64.4x132% / 67.3x
10.0x114% / 44.4x118% / 49.7x123% / 55.0x125% / 57.6x127% / 60.2x
11.0x109% / 40.0x114% / 44.9x118% / 49.7x120% / 52.1x122% / 54.5x
12.0x105% / 36.4x110% / 40.9x114% / 45.3x116% / 47.5x118% / 49.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.4x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.1x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$418K$418K0.8%
Year 1$431K+$1.9M$2.4M4.3%
Year 2$444K+$2.9M$3.4M6.1%
Year 3$457K+$2.9M$3.4M6.1%
Year 4$471K+$2.9M$3.4M6.1%
Year 5$485K+$2.9M$3.4M6.1%
$4.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.3M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$666K
Organic Growth
$29.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$555K$833K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$550K$824K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$338K$507K$675K$811K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$43K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.8%-9.2%-4.6%1.1%
P64
Net-to-Gross100.0%31.1%35.6%46.3%
P91
Occupancy27.5%26.6%33.1%47.6%
P31
Rev/Bed$816K$1.5M$2.1M$2.7M
P9
Exp/Bed$810K$1.6M$2.0M$2.7M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML