Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SIOUX FALLS INC 2026-04-26 03:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SIOUX FALLS INC
CCN 432002 | SD | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$715K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$715K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$520K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$715K
Modeled Uplift
$522K
Risk-Adjusted
-$193K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$271K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$269K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$165K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$715K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$271K$271K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$261K$8K$269K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$123K$165K$520K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$68K$136K$203K$271K$271K$271K$271K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$67K$135K$202K$269K$269K$269K$269K
A/R Days Reduction$0$55K$110K$165K$165K$165K$165K$165K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$195K$390K$580K$715K$715K$715K$715K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $715K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M16.4%
Year 1$2.3M+$477K$2.8M20.4%
Year 2$2.4M+$715K$3.1M22.7%
Year 3$2.4M+$715K$3.1M23.2%
Year 4$2.5M+$715K$3.2M23.7%
Year 5$2.6M+$715K$3.3M24.3%
$22.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$36.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.0M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$7.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$136K$203K$271K$325K
Denial Rate Reductio$135K$202K$269K$323K
A/R Days Reduction$83K$124K$165K$198K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$358K$536K$715K$858K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.4%-10.3%-3.1%8.9%
P93
Net-to-Gross20.9%45.8%52.6%62.3%
P0
Occupancy73.0%13.6%20.4%41.0%
P95
Rev/Bed$565K$565K$962K$1.3M
P24
Exp/Bed$472K$598K$982K$1.6M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML