Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DE SMET MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DE SMET MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 431332 | SD | 6 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$446K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$446K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$319K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$446K
Modeled Uplift
$276K
Risk-Adjusted
-$170K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$168K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$166K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$101K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$446K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$160K$8K$168K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$166K$166K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$26K$76K$101K$319K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$42K$84K$126K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Cost to Collect$0$42K$83K$125K$166K$166K$166K$166K
A/R Days Reduction$0$34K$67K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$122K$244K$362K$446K$446K$446K$446K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $446K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M20.3%
Year 1$1.7M+$297K$2.0M24.5%
Year 2$1.8M+$446K$2.2M26.9%
Year 3$1.8M+$446K$2.3M27.5%
Year 4$1.9M+$446K$2.3M28.2%
Year 5$2.0M+$446K$2.4M28.9%
$16.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.5M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.7M
Organic Growth
$4.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$84K$126K$168K$202K
Cost to Collect$83K$125K$166K$200K
A/R Days Reduction$51K$76K$101K$121K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$223K$334K$446K$535K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.3%-22.5%-8.7%2.4%
P95
Net-to-Gross52.2%35.8%53.0%71.5%
P49
Occupancy15.9%15.4%24.4%38.0%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.4M$845K$1.4M$2.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.6M$2.7M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML