Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MILBANK AREA HOSPITAL/AVERA HEALTH 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MILBANK AREA HOSPITAL/AVERA HEALTH
CCN 431326 | SD | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $4.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$920K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$785K
Risk-Adjusted
-$476K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$480K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$475K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$292K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$480K$480K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$462K$13K$475K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$218K$292K$920K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$120K$240K$360K$480K$480K$480K$480K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$237K$356K$475K$475K$475K$475K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$195K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$344K$687K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M13.7%
Year 1$3.4M+$841K$4.2M17.6%
Year 2$3.5M+$1.3M$4.7M19.8%
Year 3$3.6M+$1.3M$4.9M20.2%
Year 4$3.7M+$1.3M$5.0M20.7%
Year 5$3.8M+$1.3M$5.1M21.1%
$32.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$55.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.9M
Value Created
$5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$5.2M
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$240K$360K$480K$576K
Denial Rate Reductio$237K$356K$475K$570K
A/R Days Reduction$146K$219K$292K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$18K
Total$631K$946K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.7%-8.7%-1.9%8.9%
P80
Net-to-Gross46.7%38.3%51.1%60.6%
P32
Occupancy18.1%13.7%23.0%41.0%
P40
Rev/Bed$959K$565K$976K$1.6M
P41
Exp/Bed$828K$598K$1.1M$1.7M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML