Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FALL RIVER HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FALL RIVER HOSPITAL
CCN 431322 | SD | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $96K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$96K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$933K
Risk-Adjusted
-$561K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$568K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$562K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$345K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$568K$568K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$546K$16K$562K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$258K$345K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$142K$284K$426K$568K$568K$568K$568K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$141K$281K$422K$562K$562K$562K$562K
A/R Days Reduction$0$115K$230K$345K$345K$345K$345K$345K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$407K$813K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x160% / 119.0x166% / 132.6x171% / 146.1x173% / 152.9x176% / 159.7x
9.0x154% / 105.4x159% / 117.5x165% / 129.5x167% / 135.6x169% / 141.6x
10.0x148% / 94.5x154% / 105.4x159% / 116.2x161% / 121.7x164% / 127.1x
11.0x144% / 85.6x149% / 95.5x154% / 105.4x156% / 110.3x158% / 115.3x
12.0x139% / 78.2x144% / 87.3x149% / 96.3x152% / 100.9x154% / 105.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.0x
Headroom (turns)
92%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 92% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.5x, adding 8.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$96K$96K0.3%
Year 1$99K+$996K$1.1M3.9%
Year 2$102K+$1.5M$1.6M5.6%
Year 3$105K+$1.5M$1.6M5.6%
Year 4$108K+$1.5M$1.6M5.6%
Year 5$111K+$1.5M$1.6M5.7%
$960K
Entry EV (10x)
$17.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.7M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$153K
Organic Growth
$14.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$284K$426K$568K$681K
Denial Rate Reductio$281K$422K$562K$674K
A/R Days Reduction$173K$259K$345K$415K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$747K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-8.7%-1.9%8.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross59.9%38.3%51.1%60.6%
P71
Occupancy20.4%13.7%23.0%41.0%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.1M$565K$976K$1.6M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.1M$598K$1.1M$1.7M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML