Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MONUMENT HEALTH STURGIS REGIONAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MONUMENT HEALTH STURGIS REGIONAL
CCN 431321 | SD | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $748K (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$748K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$658K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$783K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$775K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$476K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$783K$783K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$753K$22K$775K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$120K$356K$476K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$196K$391K$587K$783K$783K$783K$783K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$194K$387K$581K$775K$775K$775K$775K
A/R Days Reduction$0$159K$318K$476K$476K$476K$476K$476K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$561K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
21.3x
Headroom (turns)
328%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 328% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.8x, adding 113.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-3.3%
Year 1$-1.3M+$1.4M$23K0.1%
Year 2$-1.4M+$2.1M$669K1.7%
Year 3$-1.4M+$2.1M$627K1.6%
Year 4$-1.5M+$2.1M$584K1.5%
Year 5$-1.5M+$2.1M$540K1.4%
$-13.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.0M
Value Created
$540K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.1M
Organic Growth
$20.6M
RCM Value Creation
$540K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$391K$587K$783K$939K
Denial Rate Reductio$387K$581K$775K$930K
A/R Days Reduction$238K$357K$476K$572K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-8.7%-1.9%8.9%
P44
Net-to-Gross48.4%38.3%51.1%60.6%
P37
Occupancy45.7%13.7%23.0%41.0%
P81
Rev/Bed$1.6M$565K$976K$1.6M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.6M$598K$1.1M$1.7M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML