Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOWDLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOWDLE HOSPITAL
CCN 431318 | SD | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $-741K (+$545K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$545K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-741K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+532bps
Margin Improvement
$393K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$545K
Modeled Uplift
$338K
Risk-Adjusted
-$207K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$205K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$205K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$125K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$545K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$197K$8K$205K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$205K$205K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$31K$93K$125K$393K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$51K$103K$154K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Cost to Collect$0$51K$102K$154K$205K$205K$205K$205K
A/R Days Reduction$0$42K$83K$125K$125K$125K$125K$125K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$149K$298K$442K$545K$545K$545K$545K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $545K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-12.5%
Year 1$-1.3M+$363K$-961K-9.4%
Year 2$-1.4M+$545K$-819K-8.0%
Year 3$-1.4M+$545K$-860K-8.4%
Year 4$-1.4M+$545K$-902K-8.8%
Year 5$-1.5M+$545K$-946K-9.2%
$-12.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-10.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.5M
Value Created
$-946K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$5.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-946K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$103K$154K$205K$247K
Cost to Collect$102K$154K$205K$246K
A/R Days Reduction$62K$93K$125K$150K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$272K$408K$545K$654K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.5%-11.5%-1.5%2.4%
P19
Net-to-Gross71.7%52.3%62.3%71.7%
P71
Occupancy17.7%13.5%18.1%37.6%
P43
Rev/Bed$854K$565K$854K$1.1M
P48
Exp/Bed$961K$515K$944K$1.1M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML