Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 431316 | SD | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-862K → Pro Forma $-50K (+$812K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-862K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$812K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-50K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$592K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$812K
Modeled Uplift
$502K
Risk-Adjusted
-$310K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$309K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$306K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$188K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$812K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$309K$309K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$297K$8K$306K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$140K$188K$592K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$77K$154K$231K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$153K$229K$306K$306K$306K$306K
A/R Days Reduction$0$63K$125K$188K$188K$188K$188K$188K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$221K$442K$658K$812K$812K$812K$812K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $812K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-862K$-862K-5.6%
Year 1$-888K+$541K$-347K-2.2%
Year 2$-914K+$812K$-103K-0.7%
Year 3$-942K+$812K$-130K-0.8%
Year 4$-970K+$812K$-158K-1.0%
Year 5$-999K+$812K$-187K-1.2%
$-8.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.6M
Value Created
$-187K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$8.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-187K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$154K$231K$309K$370K
Denial Rate Reductio$153K$229K$306K$367K
A/R Days Reduction$94K$141K$188K$225K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$406K$609K$812K$974K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.6%-8.7%-1.9%8.9%
P39
Net-to-Gross68.5%38.3%51.1%60.6%
P90
Occupancy20.0%13.7%23.0%41.0%
P42
Rev/Bed$617K$565K$976K$1.6M
P29
Exp/Bed$652K$598K$1.1M$1.7M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML