Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVERA FLANDREAU HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVERA FLANDREAU HOSPITAL
CCN 431310 | SD | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$570K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$570K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$412K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$570K
Modeled Uplift
$338K
Risk-Adjusted
-$232K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$215K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$215K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$131K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$570K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$207K$8K$215K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$215K$215K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$98K$131K$412K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$54K$108K$161K$215K$215K$215K$215K
Cost to Collect$0$54K$107K$161K$215K$215K$215K$215K
A/R Days Reduction$0$44K$87K$131K$131K$131K$131K$131K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$156K$312K$463K$570K$570K$570K$570K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $570K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M13.8%
Year 1$1.5M+$380K$1.9M17.7%
Year 2$1.6M+$570K$2.1M19.9%
Year 3$1.6M+$570K$2.2M20.4%
Year 4$1.7M+$570K$2.2M20.8%
Year 5$1.7M+$570K$2.3M21.3%
$14.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.4M
Organic Growth
$5.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$108K$161K$215K$258K
Cost to Collect$107K$161K$215K$258K
A/R Days Reduction$65K$98K$131K$157K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$285K$428K$570K$684K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.8%-8.3%-1.6%9.4%
P82
Net-to-Gross50.2%49.6%54.4%66.8%
P30
Occupancy12.0%13.5%20.4%37.6%
P17
Rev/Bed$597K$589K$961K$1.2M
P25
Exp/Bed$515K$619K$961K$1.2M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML