Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PLATTE HEALTH CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PLATTE HEALTH CENTER INC.
CCN 431306 | SD | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $419K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$900K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$419K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$900K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$656K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$900K
Modeled Uplift
$552K
Risk-Adjusted
-$348K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$342K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$339K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$208K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$900K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$342K$342K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$329K$9K$339K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$156K$208K$656K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$171K$257K$342K$342K$342K$342K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$169K$254K$339K$339K$339K$339K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$139K$208K$208K$208K$208K$208K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$245K$490K$730K$900K$900K$900K$900K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $900K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.6x92% / 26.3x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.0x
9.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x
10.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.5x86% / 22.6x
11.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x
12.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$419K$419K2.4%
Year 1$432K+$600K$1.0M6.0%
Year 2$444K+$900K$1.3M7.9%
Year 3$458K+$900K$1.4M7.9%
Year 4$472K+$900K$1.4M8.0%
Year 5$486K+$900K$1.4M8.1%
$4.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.1M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$667K
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$171K$257K$342K$411K
Denial Rate Reductio$169K$254K$339K$407K
A/R Days Reduction$104K$156K$208K$250K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$450K$675K$900K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-8.3%-1.6%9.4%
P68
Net-to-Gross67.1%49.6%54.4%66.8%
P75
Occupancy14.1%13.2%20.5%38.4%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.0M$589K$961K$1.2M
P60
Exp/Bed$982K$608K$959K$1.2M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML