Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOUGLAS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOUGLAS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 431305 | SD | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $-70K → Pro Forma $591K (+$661K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-70K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$661K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$591K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$480K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$661K
Modeled Uplift
$413K
Risk-Adjusted
-$248K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$250K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$249K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$152K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$661K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$250K$250K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$241K$8K$249K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$114K$152K$480K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT72.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$125K$188K$250K$250K$250K$250K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$124K$187K$249K$249K$249K$249K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$101K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$180K$361K$536K$661K$661K$661K$661K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $661K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.5x
Headroom (turns)
115%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 115% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.0x, adding 100.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-70K$-70K-0.6%
Year 1$-72K+$440K$368K2.9%
Year 2$-74K+$661K$586K4.7%
Year 3$-77K+$661K$584K4.7%
Year 4$-79K+$661K$582K4.7%
Year 5$-81K+$661K$579K4.6%
$-701K
Entry EV (10x)
$6.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.1M
Value Created
$579K
Exit EBITDA
$-112K
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$579K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$125K$188K$250K$300K
Denial Rate Reductio$124K$187K$249K$299K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$114K$152K$183K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$330K$496K$661K$793K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.6%-12.0%-1.6%1.1%
P63
Net-to-Gross67.4%52.5%66.6%72.0%
P58
Occupancy20.8%13.6%18.1%34.8%
P58
Rev/Bed$1.1M$654K$856K$1.1M
P74
Exp/Bed$1.1M$664K$958K$1.1M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML