Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVERA HEART HOSPITAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVERA HEART HOSPITAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA
CCN 430095 | SD | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $9.4M (+$7.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$139.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$7.3M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$89K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$76K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$427K$1.3M$1.7M$5.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$89K$89K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$695K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$688K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$44K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.6x103% / 34.4x107% / 38.2x109% / 40.1x111% / 42.0x
9.0x93% / 26.9x98% / 30.2x102% / 33.6x104% / 35.3x106% / 36.9x
10.0x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.9x97% / 29.9x99% / 31.4x101% / 32.9x
11.0x85% / 21.4x89% / 24.1x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.3x97% / 29.6x
12.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
71%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 71% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M1.5%
Year 1$2.2M+$4.9M$7.0M5.1%
Year 2$2.2M+$7.3M$9.5M6.9%
Year 3$2.3M+$7.3M$9.6M6.9%
Year 4$2.4M+$7.3M$9.7M7.0%
Year 5$2.4M+$7.3M$9.8M7.0%
$21.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$107.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$86.2M
Value Created
$9.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.3M
Organic Growth
$73.1M
RCM Value Creation
$9.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$846K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$44K$67K$89K$107K
Total$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-8.7%-1.9%1.9%
P62
Net-to-Gross22.6%30.0%35.6%44.8%
P0
Occupancy47.6%25.3%33.1%44.3%
P73
Rev/Bed$2.6M$1.6M$2.6M$2.9M
P54
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.6M$2.3M$2.8M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML