Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLACK HILLS SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLP 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLACK HILLS SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLP
CCN 430091 | SD | 26 beds | Current EBITDA $14.0M → Pro Forma $18.7M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$91.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$279K$829K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$455K$911K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$451K$901K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$369K$739K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.0M$14.0M15.3%
Year 1$14.4M+$3.2M$17.6M19.3%
Year 2$14.8M+$4.8M$19.6M21.5%
Year 3$15.2M+$4.8M$20.0M22.0%
Year 4$15.7M+$4.8M$20.5M22.5%
Year 5$16.2M+$4.8M$21.0M23.0%
$139.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$230.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$91.1M
Value Created
$21.0M
Exit EBITDA
$22.2M
Organic Growth
$47.9M
RCM Value Creation
$21.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$911K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$901K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$554K$831K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.3%-8.7%-1.9%8.9%
P90
Net-to-Gross38.3%38.3%51.1%60.6%
P24
Occupancy41.5%13.7%23.0%41.0%
P77
Rev/Bed$3.5M$565K$976K$1.6M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.0M$598K$1.1M$1.7M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML