Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SIOUXLAND SURGERY CENTER 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SIOUXLAND SURGERY CENTER
CCN 430089 | SD | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $42.4M → Pro Forma $48.0M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$105.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$42.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$48.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$68K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$58K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$324K$962K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$528K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$523K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$429K$857K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$42.4M$42.4M40.1%
Year 1$43.7M+$3.7M$47.4M44.9%
Year 2$45.0M+$5.6M$50.6M47.9%
Year 3$46.4M+$5.6M$51.9M49.1%
Year 4$47.7M+$5.6M$53.3M50.4%
Year 5$49.2M+$5.6M$54.7M51.8%
$424.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$602.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$177.9M
Value Created
$54.7M
Exit EBITDA
$67.6M
Organic Growth
$55.6M
RCM Value Creation
$54.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$643K$964K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$68K$81K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin40.1%-7.9%-2.5%8.5%
P97
Net-to-Gross29.4%35.7%49.3%55.8%
P8
Occupancy14.7%14.7%26.7%41.0%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.8M$604K$1.1M$2.2M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.7M$669K$1.2M$2.3M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML