Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVERA ST. LUKES 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVERA ST. LUKES
CCN 430014 | SD | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $-15.4M → Pro Forma $-4.3M (+$11.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$210.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-15.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$11.1M
Modeled Uplift
$8.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.4M (vs $11.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$135K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$116K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$646K$1.9M$2.6M$8.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$854K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.0M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-15.4M$-15.4M-7.3%
Year 1$-15.8M+$7.4M$-8.4M-4.0%
Year 2$-16.3M+$11.1M$-5.2M-2.5%
Year 3$-16.8M+$11.1M$-5.7M-2.7%
Year 4$-17.3M+$11.1M$-6.2M-2.9%
Year 5$-17.8M+$11.1M$-6.7M-3.2%
$-153.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-73.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.6M
Value Created
$-6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-24.5M
Organic Growth
$110.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$101K$135K$162K
Total$5.5M$8.3M$11.1M$13.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.3%-7.6%-3.2%7.4%
P30
Net-to-Gross32.3%35.6%48.1%53.3%
P13
Occupancy63.8%17.6%27.1%40.9%
P88
Rev/Bed$4.2M$856K$1.3M$2.6M
P90
Exp/Bed$4.5M$846K$1.6M$2.6M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML