Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALMETTO LOW COUNTRY BHD 2026-04-26 09:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALMETTO LOW COUNTRY BHD
CCN 424006 | SC | 108 beds | Current EBITDA $-956K → Pro Forma $-232K (+$724K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-956K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$724K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-232K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$527K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$724K
Modeled Uplift
$475K
Risk-Adjusted
-$249K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$275K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$273K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$167K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$724K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$275K$275K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$264K$8K$273K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$125K$167K$527K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$69K$137K$206K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$68K$136K$204K$273K$273K$273K$273K
A/R Days Reduction$0$56K$111K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$197K$395K$587K$724K$724K$724K$724K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $724K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-956K$-956K-7.0%
Year 1$-985K+$483K$-502K-3.7%
Year 2$-1.0M+$724K$-290K-2.1%
Year 3$-1.0M+$724K$-321K-2.3%
Year 4$-1.1M+$724K$-352K-2.6%
Year 5$-1.1M+$724K$-384K-2.8%
$-9.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.3M
Value Created
$-384K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.5M
Organic Growth
$7.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-384K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$137K$206K$275K$330K
Denial Rate Reductio$136K$204K$273K$327K
A/R Days Reduction$84K$125K$167K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$362K$543K$724K$869K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.0%-7.3%5.2%18.1%
P30
Net-to-Gross27.4%18.5%25.5%28.6%
P64
Occupancy52.1%52.1%64.7%74.5%
P24
Rev/Bed$127K$366K$959K$1.6M
P0
Exp/Bed$136K$305K$1.1M$1.5M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML