Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TIDELANDS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TIDELANDS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 423033 | SC | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $8.4M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$508K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$712K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$704K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$433K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$712K$712K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$685K$20K$704K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$109K$324K$433K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$178K$356K$534K$712K$712K$712K$712K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$176K$352K$528K$704K$704K$704K$704K
A/R Days Reduction$0$144K$289K$433K$433K$433K$433K$433K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$510K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x28% / 3.5x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.4M$8.4M23.5%
Year 1$8.6M+$1.2M$9.9M27.8%
Year 2$8.9M+$1.9M$10.8M30.2%
Year 3$9.2M+$1.9M$11.0M31.0%
Year 4$9.4M+$1.9M$11.3M31.8%
Year 5$9.7M+$1.9M$11.6M32.5%
$83.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$127.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.6M
Value Created
$11.6M
Exit EBITDA
$13.3M
Organic Growth
$18.7M
RCM Value Creation
$11.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$356K$534K$712K$854K
Denial Rate Reductio$352K$528K$704K$845K
A/R Days Reduction$216K$325K$433K$520K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$936K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.5%-6.0%7.6%17.6%
P80
Net-to-Gross69.5%20.7%27.1%57.6%
P89
Occupancy75.5%51.3%67.1%76.3%
P69
Rev/Bed$474K$446K$732K$1.7M
P32
Exp/Bed$363K$375K$657K$1.4M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML