Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 423032 | SC | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $333K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$872K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$333K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$872K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$636K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$872K
Modeled Uplift
$636K
Risk-Adjusted
-$236K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$331K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$328K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$202K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$872K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$331K$331K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$319K$9K$328K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$151K$202K$636K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$83K$166K$249K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$164K$246K$328K$328K$328K$328K
A/R Days Reduction$0$67K$134K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$237K$475K$707K$872K$872K$872K$872K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $872K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x89% / 24.4x94% / 27.4x98% / 30.5x100% / 32.0x102% / 33.5x
9.0x84% / 21.3x89% / 24.0x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.1x97% / 29.5x
10.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.3x88% / 23.7x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.2x
11.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.1x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.5x
12.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.2x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
64%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 64% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$333K$333K2.0%
Year 1$343K+$581K$925K5.6%
Year 2$354K+$872K$1.2M7.4%
Year 3$364K+$872K$1.2M7.5%
Year 4$375K+$872K$1.2M7.5%
Year 5$387K+$872K$1.3M7.6%
$3.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.5M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$531K
Organic Growth
$8.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$166K$249K$331K$398K
Denial Rate Reductio$164K$246K$328K$394K
A/R Days Reduction$101K$151K$202K$242K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$436K$654K$872K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.0%-12.7%1.8%16.6%
P50
Net-to-Gross63.5%22.7%31.8%60.9%
P75
Occupancy76.3%42.0%64.9%75.7%
P75
Rev/Bed$436K$452K$616K$1.8M
P20
Exp/Bed$427K$395K$657K$1.5M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML