Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPARTANBURG REHABILITATION INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPARTANBURG REHABILITATION INSTITUTE
CCN 423031 | SC | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $929K → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$963K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$929K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$963K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$702K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$963K
Modeled Uplift
$709K
Risk-Adjusted
-$254K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$366K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$362K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$223K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$963K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$366K$366K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$352K$10K$362K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$223K$702K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$183K$275K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$181K$272K$362K$362K$362K$362K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$262K$524K$781K$963K$963K$963K$963K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $963K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
9.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
10.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
11.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
12.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$929K$929K5.1%
Year 1$957K+$642K$1.6M8.7%
Year 2$986K+$963K$1.9M10.6%
Year 3$1.0M+$963K$2.0M10.8%
Year 4$1.0M+$963K$2.0M11.0%
Year 5$1.1M+$963K$2.0M11.1%
$9.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$22.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$183K$275K$366K$439K
Denial Rate Reductio$181K$272K$362K$435K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$167K$223K$267K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$481K$722K$963K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.1%-11.9%1.8%16.6%
P52
Net-to-Gross60.1%22.2%30.0%60.0%
P74
Occupancy79.8%44.1%65.3%75.5%
P79
Rev/Bed$458K$454K$672K$1.8M
P29
Exp/Bed$434K$404K$676K$1.7M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML