Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREENWOOD REGIONAL REHABILIATION HOS 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREENWOOD REGIONAL REHABILIATION HOS
CCN 423030 | SC | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $146K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$958K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$146K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$958K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$698K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$958K
Modeled Uplift
$661K
Risk-Adjusted
-$297K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$364K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$360K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$222K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$958K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$364K$364K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$350K$10K$360K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$166K$222K$698K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$182K$273K$364K$364K$364K$364K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$261K$522K$777K$958K$958K$958K$958K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $958K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x121% / 53.1x126% / 59.3x131% / 65.6x133% / 68.7x135% / 71.8x
9.0x116% / 46.8x121% / 52.4x125% / 57.9x127% / 60.7x129% / 63.5x
10.0x111% / 41.8x116% / 46.8x120% / 51.8x122% / 54.3x124% / 56.8x
11.0x107% / 37.7x111% / 42.3x116% / 46.8x118% / 49.1x120% / 51.4x
12.0x103% / 34.3x108% / 38.5x112% / 42.6x114% / 44.7x116% / 46.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.4x
Headroom (turns)
83%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 83% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.1x, adding 7.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$146K$146K0.8%
Year 1$151K+$638K$789K4.3%
Year 2$155K+$958K$1.1M6.1%
Year 3$160K+$958K$1.1M6.1%
Year 4$165K+$958K$1.1M6.2%
Year 5$170K+$958K$1.1M6.2%
$1.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.9M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$233K
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$182K$273K$364K$437K
Denial Rate Reductio$180K$270K$360K$433K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$166K$222K$266K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$479K$718K$958K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.8%-11.9%1.8%16.6%
P40
Net-to-Gross71.3%22.2%30.0%60.0%
P90
Occupancy60.8%44.1%65.3%75.5%
P40
Rev/Bed$433K$454K$672K$1.8M
P17
Exp/Bed$430K$404K$676K$1.7M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML