Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ANMED HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ANMED HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 423029 | SC | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $9.6M → Pro Forma $11.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$390K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$539K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$534K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$328K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$539K$539K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$519K$15K$534K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$83K$245K$328K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$135K$270K$405K$539K$539K$539K$539K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$133K$267K$400K$534K$534K$534K$534K
A/R Days Reduction$0$109K$219K$328K$328K$328K$328K$328K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$386K$773K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.6M$9.6M35.5%
Year 1$9.9M+$946K$10.8M40.1%
Year 2$10.2M+$1.4M$11.6M43.0%
Year 3$10.5M+$1.4M$11.9M44.1%
Year 4$10.8M+$1.4M$12.2M45.2%
Year 5$11.1M+$1.4M$12.5M46.4%
$95.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$42.0M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$15.3M
Organic Growth
$14.2M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$270K$405K$539K$647K
Denial Rate Reductio$267K$400K$534K$641K
A/R Days Reduction$164K$246K$328K$394K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$709K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin35.5%-7.2%3.5%17.4%
P93
Net-to-Gross74.6%19.1%27.3%52.7%
P93
Occupancy74.0%45.9%65.3%75.5%
P65
Rev/Bed$449K$439K$687K$1.6M
P26
Exp/Bed$290K$380K$657K$1.2M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML