Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 423028 | SC | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $11.0M → Pro Forma $12.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$381K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$593K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$587K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$361K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$593K$593K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$571K$16K$587K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$270K$361K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$148K$297K$445K$593K$593K$593K$593K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$147K$294K$440K$587K$587K$587K$587K
A/R Days Reduction$0$120K$241K$361K$361K$361K$361K$361K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$425K$850K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x25% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.0M$11.0M37.1%
Year 1$11.3M+$1.0M$12.4M41.7%
Year 2$11.7M+$1.6M$13.2M44.6%
Year 3$12.0M+$1.6M$13.6M45.8%
Year 4$12.4M+$1.6M$13.9M47.0%
Year 5$12.7M+$1.6M$14.3M48.2%
$109.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$157.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.4M
Value Created
$14.3M
Exit EBITDA
$17.5M
Organic Growth
$15.6M
RCM Value Creation
$14.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$297K$445K$593K$712K
Denial Rate Reductio$294K$440K$587K$705K
A/R Days Reduction$180K$271K$361K$433K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$23K
Total$780K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin37.1%-13.4%1.8%16.6%
P96
Net-to-Gross81.9%22.2%30.0%60.0%
P98
Occupancy91.4%39.9%65.3%75.5%
P89
Rev/Bed$593K$450K$672K$1.7M
P43
Exp/Bed$373K$391K$676K$1.6M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML