Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 15:11 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 423026 | SC | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$853K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$781K
Risk-Adjusted
-$389K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$445K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$440K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$271K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$445K$445K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$428K$12K$440K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$68K$202K$271K$853K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$111K$222K$334K$445K$445K$445K$445K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$110K$220K$330K$440K$440K$440K$440K
A/R Days Reduction$0$90K$180K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$319K$637K$949K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M14.1%
Year 1$3.2M+$780K$4.0M18.1%
Year 2$3.3M+$1.2M$4.5M20.3%
Year 3$3.4M+$1.2M$4.6M20.7%
Year 4$3.5M+$1.2M$4.7M21.2%
Year 5$3.6M+$1.2M$4.8M21.7%
$31.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$53.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.5M
Value Created
$4.8M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$11.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$222K$334K$445K$534K
Denial Rate Reductio$220K$330K$440K$528K
A/R Days Reduction$135K$203K$271K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$585K$878K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.1%-7.1%2.7%17.3%
P64
Net-to-Gross66.6%19.5%27.2%48.7%
P85
Occupancy51.3%46.2%66.1%75.7%
P29
Rev/Bed$348K$443K$726K$1.6M
P13
Exp/Bed$298K$377K$657K$1.3M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML