Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF GREENVILLE 2026-04-26 14:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF GREENVILLE
CCN 422009 | SC | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $-457K → Pro Forma $314K (+$771K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-457K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$771K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$314K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$562K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$771K
Modeled Uplift
$547K
Risk-Adjusted
-$224K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$293K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$290K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$178K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$771K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$293K$293K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$282K$8K$290K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$133K$178K$562K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$73K$146K$220K$293K$293K$293K$293K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$145K$218K$290K$290K$290K$290K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$119K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$210K$420K$625K$771K$771K$771K$771K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $771K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-12.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.8x
Headroom (turns)
289%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 289% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -12.3x, adding 111.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-457K$-457K-3.1%
Year 1$-470K+$514K$44K0.3%
Year 2$-484K+$771K$286K2.0%
Year 3$-499K+$771K$272K1.9%
Year 4$-514K+$771K$257K1.8%
Year 5$-529K+$771K$241K1.6%
$-4.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.2M
Value Created
$241K
Exit EBITDA
$-727K
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$241K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$146K$220K$293K$351K
Denial Rate Reductio$145K$218K$290K$348K
A/R Days Reduction$89K$134K$178K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$385K$578K$771K$925K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.1%-15.2%1.4%14.9%
P38
Net-to-Gross10.0%23.0%32.2%60.1%
P0
Occupancy66.6%43.6%64.3%76.3%
P54
Rev/Bed$458K$449K$614K$1.7M
P30
Exp/Bed$472K$397K$657K$1.5M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML