Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALLENDALE COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALLENDALE COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 421300 | SC | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.4M → Pro Forma $-3.7M (+$702K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$702K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$511K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$702K
Modeled Uplift
$412K
Risk-Adjusted
-$290K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$266K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$265K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$162K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$702K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$256K$8K$265K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$41K$121K$162K$511K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$67K$133K$200K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$66K$132K$198K$265K$265K$265K$265K
A/R Days Reduction$0$54K$108K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$192K$383K$570K$702K$702K$702K$702K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $702K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.4M$-4.4M-33.1%
Year 1$-4.5M+$468K$-4.1M-30.6%
Year 2$-4.7M+$702K$-4.0M-29.9%
Year 3$-4.8M+$702K$-4.1M-30.9%
Year 4$-5.0M+$702K$-4.3M-32.0%
Year 5$-5.1M+$702K$-4.4M-33.1%
$-44.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-48.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-4.4M
Value Created
$-4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.0M
Organic Growth
$7.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$133K$200K$266K$320K
Denial Rate Reductio$132K$198K$265K$317K
A/R Days Reduction$81K$122K$162K$194K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$351K$527K$702K$843K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-33.1%-14.1%1.3%13.1%
P6
Net-to-Gross59.9%23.9%31.8%59.9%
P72
Occupancy12.2%35.2%63.0%77.2%
P3
Rev/Bed$533K$458K$672K$1.8M
P34
Exp/Bed$709K$433K$702K$1.8M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML