Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROPER ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL-BERKELEY 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROPER ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL-BERKELEY
CCN 420110 | SC | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $15.4M → Pro Forma $21.7M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$119.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$76K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$365K$1.1M$1.4M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$76K$76K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$595K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$589K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$483K$965K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.4M$15.4M13.0%
Year 1$15.9M+$4.2M$20.1M16.9%
Year 2$16.4M+$6.3M$22.6M19.0%
Year 3$16.9M+$6.3M$23.1M19.4%
Year 4$17.4M+$6.3M$23.6M19.9%
Year 5$17.9M+$6.3M$24.2M20.3%
$154.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$265.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$111.4M
Value Created
$24.2M
Exit EBITDA
$24.6M
Organic Growth
$62.6M
RCM Value Creation
$24.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$724K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$57K$76K$91K
Total$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.0%-11.5%2.0%16.6%
P63
Net-to-Gross24.2%22.4%28.5%60.0%
P33
Occupancy82.2%40.3%65.0%75.5%
P84
Rev/Bed$2.6M$455K$726K$1.8M
P88
Exp/Bed$2.3M$412K$695K$1.7M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML