Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNION MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNION MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 420108 | SC | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$559K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$600K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$594K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$365K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$600K$600K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$578K$17K$594K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$273K$365K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$150K$300K$450K$600K$600K$600K$600K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$149K$297K$446K$594K$594K$594K$594K
A/R Days Reduction$0$122K$244K$365K$365K$365K$365K$365K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$430K$860K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x
9.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 14.0x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x
10.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.3x
11.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x
12.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M4.3%
Year 1$1.3M+$1.1M$2.4M7.9%
Year 2$1.4M+$1.6M$2.9M9.8%
Year 3$1.4M+$1.6M$3.0M10.0%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.6M$3.0M10.1%
Year 5$1.5M+$1.6M$3.1M10.2%
$12.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.9M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$15.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$300K$450K$600K$721K
Denial Rate Reductio$297K$446K$594K$713K
A/R Days Reduction$183K$274K$365K$438K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$790K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-21.9%-15.6%-8.2%
P75
Net-to-Gross24.5%24.2%31.8%49.4%
P38
Occupancy30.9%26.7%33.9%40.1%
P25
Rev/Bed$2.0M$597K$1.3M$2.1M
P62
Exp/Bed$1.9M$705K$1.5M$2.1M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML