Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PELHAM MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PELHAM MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 420103 | SC | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $23.4M → Pro Forma $30.7M (+$7.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$137.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$23.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$30.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$7.2M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $7.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$88K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$75K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$421K$1.2M$1.7M$5.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$88K$88K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$686K$1.4M$2.1M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$679K$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$557K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$44K$88K$88K$88K$88K$88K$88K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$23.4M$23.4M17.1%
Year 1$24.1M+$4.8M$29.0M21.1%
Year 2$24.9M+$7.2M$32.1M23.4%
Year 3$25.6M+$7.2M$32.8M23.9%
Year 4$26.4M+$7.2M$33.6M24.5%
Year 5$27.2M+$7.2M$34.4M25.1%
$234.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$378.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$143.9M
Value Created
$34.4M
Exit EBITDA
$37.3M
Organic Growth
$72.2M
RCM Value Creation
$34.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.7M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$835K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$44K$66K$88K$105K
Total$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.1%-11.1%3.5%16.8%
P75
Net-to-Gross26.9%22.7%30.0%60.9%
P41
Occupancy86.2%42.0%65.3%75.5%
P89
Rev/Bed$2.9M$452K$672K$1.8M
P93
Exp/Bed$2.4M$395K$676K$1.7M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML