Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WACCAMAW COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WACCAMAW COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 420098 | SC | 124 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $14.6M (+$9.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$182.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$9.6M
Modeled Uplift
$6.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.9M (vs $9.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$117K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$101K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$561K$1.7M$2.2M$7.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$117K$117K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$914K$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$905K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$741K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$58K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x
9.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.1x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.5x
10.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
11.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
12.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M2.7%
Year 1$5.1M+$6.4M$11.5M6.3%
Year 2$5.3M+$9.6M$14.9M8.2%
Year 3$5.4M+$9.6M$15.1M8.2%
Year 4$5.6M+$9.6M$15.2M8.3%
Year 5$5.8M+$9.6M$15.4M8.4%
$49.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$169.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$119.5M
Value Created
$15.4M
Exit EBITDA
$7.9M
Organic Growth
$96.1M
RCM Value Creation
$15.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$58K$88K$117K$140K
Total$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-7.3%2.7%17.4%
P48
Net-to-Gross26.2%18.5%25.5%28.0%
P52
Occupancy72.4%51.5%64.2%74.1%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.5M$474K$1.1M$1.6M
P64
Exp/Bed$1.4M$327K$1.1M$1.5M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML