Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EAST COOPER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EAST COOPER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 420089 | SC | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $58.4M → Pro Forma $69.2M (+$10.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$206.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$58.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$69.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$10.8M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $10.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$132K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.1M$4.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.0M$113K$4.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$632K$1.9M$2.5M$7.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$132K$132K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$836K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$66K$132K$132K$132K$132K$132K$132K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$58.4M$58.4M28.3%
Year 1$60.1M+$7.2M$67.4M32.7%
Year 2$61.9M+$10.8M$72.8M35.3%
Year 3$63.8M+$10.8M$74.6M36.2%
Year 4$65.7M+$10.8M$76.5M37.1%
Year 5$67.7M+$10.8M$78.5M38.1%
$583.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$863.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$279.9M
Value Created
$78.5M
Exit EBITDA
$93.0M
Organic Growth
$108.4M
RCM Value Creation
$78.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$66K$99K$132K$158K
Total$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.3%-7.2%6.0%18.5%
P84
Net-to-Gross20.9%18.5%25.9%29.0%
P34
Occupancy40.6%52.1%64.9%74.6%
P15
Rev/Bed$1.7M$429K$1.1M$1.6M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.2M$302K$1.1M$1.5M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML