Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROPER HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROPER HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 420087 | SC | 266 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.0M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$21.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$400.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$21.1M
Modeled Uplift
$14.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.3M (vs $21.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$256K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.0M$8.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.7M$220K$7.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.9M$15.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$256K$256K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$128K$256K$256K$256K$256K$256K$256K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.5M$17.1M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
17.6x
Headroom (turns)
271%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 271% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.1x, adding 110.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.0M$-12.0M-3.0%
Year 1$-12.3M+$14.1M$1.7M0.4%
Year 2$-12.7M+$21.1M$8.4M2.1%
Year 3$-13.1M+$21.1M$8.0M2.0%
Year 4$-13.5M+$21.1M$7.6M1.9%
Year 5$-13.9M+$21.1M$7.2M1.8%
$-119.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$79.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$199.0M
Value Created
$7.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-19.1M
Organic Growth
$210.8M
RCM Value Creation
$7.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$128K$192K$256K$308K
Total$10.5M$15.8M$21.1M$25.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.0%-7.3%-0.0%8.3%
P38
Net-to-Gross27.9%16.4%21.7%27.9%
P71
Occupancy58.1%56.5%64.5%76.3%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.5M$788K$1.4M$1.6M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.6M$952K$1.3M$1.6M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML