Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 420086 | SC | 246 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $15.8M (+$14.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$277.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$14.6M
Modeled Uplift
$9.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.8M (vs $14.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$178K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$153K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$851K$2.5M$3.4M$10.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$178K$178K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$7.9M$11.8M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x147% / 92.5x153% / 103.1x158% / 113.8x160% / 119.1x162% / 124.4x
9.0x141% / 81.8x147% / 91.3x152% / 100.8x154% / 105.5x156% / 110.2x
10.0x136% / 73.3x141% / 81.8x146% / 90.4x148% / 94.6x151% / 98.9x
11.0x131% / 66.4x137% / 74.1x141% / 81.8x144% / 85.7x146% / 89.6x
12.0x127% / 60.6x132% / 67.7x137% / 74.8x139% / 78.3x141% / 81.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
90%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 90% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M0.4%
Year 1$1.3M+$9.7M$11.0M4.0%
Year 2$1.3M+$14.6M$15.9M5.7%
Year 3$1.3M+$14.6M$15.9M5.7%
Year 4$1.4M+$14.6M$16.0M5.8%
Year 5$1.4M+$14.6M$16.0M5.8%
$12.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$176.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$163.9M
Value Created
$16.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$146.0M
RCM Value Creation
$16.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.2M$5.5M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$133K$178K$213K
Total$7.3M$10.9M$14.6M$17.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.4%-7.2%1.6%7.9%
P45
Net-to-Gross28.0%16.7%24.8%27.8%
P77
Occupancy58.3%56.9%64.7%76.1%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.1M$831K$1.4M$1.6M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.1M$953K$1.4M$1.5M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML