Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 420082 | SC | 211 beds | Current EBITDA $-48K → Pro Forma $10.6M (+$10.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$202.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-48K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$10.6M
Modeled Uplift
$7.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.3M (vs $10.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$129K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.9M$111K$4.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$621K$1.8M$2.5M$7.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$129K$129K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$820K$1.6M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$65K$129K$129K$129K$129K$129K$129K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
101%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 101% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.0x, adding 99.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-48K$-48K-0.0%
Year 1$-49K+$7.1M$7.0M3.5%
Year 2$-51K+$10.6M$10.6M5.2%
Year 3$-52K+$10.6M$10.6M5.2%
Year 4$-54K+$10.6M$10.6M5.2%
Year 5$-55K+$10.6M$10.6M5.2%
$-477K
Entry EV (10x)
$116.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$116.9M
Value Created
$10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-76K
Organic Growth
$106.4M
RCM Value Creation
$10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$65K$97K$129K$155K
Total$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.0%-7.0%1.6%9.7%
P42
Net-to-Gross13.6%16.7%23.0%27.4%
P12
Occupancy64.0%53.2%64.0%75.9%
P48
Rev/Bed$959K$810K$1.4M$1.6M
P31
Exp/Bed$959K$939K$1.2M$1.4M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML