Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $58.4M (vs $82.9M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $31.5M | $31.5M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $30.3M | $866K | $31.2M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $4.8M | $14.3M | $19.2M | $60.4M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 28.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $7.9M | $15.7M | $23.6M | $31.5M | $31.5M | $31.5M | $31.5M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $7.8M | $15.6M | $23.4M | $31.2M | $31.2M | $31.2M | $31.2M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $6.4M | $12.8M | $19.2M | $19.2M | $19.2M | $19.2M | $19.2M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $504K | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Cumulative | $0 | $22.6M | $45.1M | $67.2M | $82.9M | $82.9M | $82.9M | $82.9M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $82.9M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 50% / 7.6x | 54% / 8.8x | 58% / 10.0x | 60% / 10.6x | 62% / 11.2x |
| 9.0x | 45% / 6.4x | 49% / 7.5x | 53% / 8.5x | 55% / 9.1x | 57% / 9.6x |
| 10.0x | 40% / 5.4x | 45% / 6.4x | 49% / 7.3x | 51% / 7.8x | 53% / 8.3x |
| 11.0x | 36% / 4.6x | 41% / 5.5x | 45% / 6.4x | 47% / 6.8x | 49% / 7.2x |
| 12.0x | 32% / 4.0x | 37% / 4.8x | 41% / 5.6x | 43% / 6.0x | 45% / 6.4x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $257.5M | — | $257.5M | 16.3% |
| Year 1 | $265.2M | +$55.2M | $320.4M | 20.3% |
| Year 2 | $273.1M | +$82.9M | $356.0M | 22.6% |
| Year 3 | $281.3M | +$82.9M | $364.2M | 23.1% |
| Year 4 | $289.8M | +$82.9M | $372.6M | 23.7% |
| Year 5 | $298.5M | +$82.9M | $381.3M | 24.2% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $15.7M | $23.6M | $31.5M | $37.8M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $15.6M | $23.4M | $31.2M | $37.4M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $9.6M | $14.4M | $19.2M | $23.0M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $504K | $756K | $1.0M | $1.2M |
| Total | $41.4M | $62.1M | $82.9M | $99.4M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 10 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 16.3% | -2.2% | 0.8% | 8.0% | P90 |
| Net-to-Gross | 28.7% | 21.0% | 26.1% | 28.5% | P70 |
| Occupancy | 88.2% | 77.1% | 78.4% | 81.9% | P90 |
| Rev/Bed | $2.2M | $1.5M | $1.6M | $2.1M | P70 |
| Exp/Bed | $1.8M | $1.4M | $1.6M | $1.8M | P70 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.